Re: I am not sure 192 is needed. From what I read, - evector

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - With DAD, why did we need DVD Audio? - Duilawyer 17:08:25 07/22/04 (92)

If you don't already have it... - Eric LeRouge 02:55:22 07/28/04 (1)

Thanks, I will get it. Not my cup of tea, musically, but for great sound....nt - Duilawyer 16:24:15 08/03/04 (0)

Hey DUI if you like the Adderly DAD check out the Sonny Clark "Cool Struttin" Elusive Disc has them all for $14.99 nt - vettracer 20:26:01 07/23/04 (2)

Get the Hank Mobley DAD also if its still avail. nt - PdL 05:50:29 07/26/04 (0)

Will do! nt. - Duilawyer 09:08:53 07/24/04 (0)

A few DVD basics... - Dr. AIX 12:49:03 07/23/04 (0)

Re: With DAD, why did we need DVD Audio? - eveector 18:32:28 07/22/04 (6)

Re: With DAD, why did we need DVD Audio? - John Kotches 14:00:21 07/23/04 (5)

Re: With DAD, why did we need DVD Audio? - evector 15:21:26 07/23/04 (4)

Now I got it. And it still looks like - Duilawyer 17:15:28 07/24/04 (3)

Re: Now I got it. And it still looks like - evector 23:31:47 07/24/04 (2)

I am not sure 192 is needed. From what I read, - Duilawyer 09:32:26 07/25/04 (1)

Re: I am not sure 192 is needed. From what I read, - evector 13:32:05 07/25/04 (0)

Re: MCH for us. Content protection for the industry. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 17:30:29 07/22/04 (77)

Re: MCH for us. Content protection for the industry. (NT) - agentalbert 19:12:14 07/22/04 (76)

No playback support, that's why - head_unit 21:58:21 07/22/04 (75)

Wrong. - Frank.. 09:18:05 07/23/04 (5)

Re: Oh Reeeeaallly? - head_unit 14:37:35 07/23/04 (3)

Re: Oh Reeeeaallly? - Martin419 15:21:26 07/23/04 (2)

Which disc? - head_unit 15:44:35 07/23/04 (1)

Re: Which disc? - Martin419 16:22:14 07/23/04 (0)

(link) - Frank.. 09:44:11 07/23/04 (0)

But if the video section has been replaced with the missing musical signal - Duilawyer 06:08:31 07/23/04 (68)

(link) - Frank.. 09:31:47 07/23/04 (0)

Re: But if the video section has been replaced with the missing musical signal - Martin419 09:26:52 07/23/04 (1)

Read my post; I clearly KNOW the difference. - Duilawyer 13:17:40 07/23/04 (0)

There's space but no format - head_unit 09:00:45 07/23/04 (64)

Re: There's space but no format - Frank.. 09:28:44 07/23/04 (63)

Flawed because of the 0.1 channel, and also - head_unit 23:33:19 07/25/04 (3)

Re: Flawed because of the 0.1 channel, and also - Frank.. 00:46:12 07/26/04 (2)

Sorry, I still don't buy it - head_unit 09:06:54 07/26/04 (1)

Actually - Frank.. 11:27:31 07/26/04 (0)

Re: There's space but no format - tunenut 10:18:31 07/23/04 (3)

Re: There's space but no format - Frank.. 11:10:28 07/23/04 (2)

agree - tunenut 11:35:43 07/23/04 (1)

Oops.. - Frank.. 12:10:16 07/23/04 (0)

Flawed? Not nonsense. Definitely flawed. - racerguy 10:02:14 07/23/04 (54)

Re: Flawed? Not nonsense. Definitely flawed. - Neil Wilkes 11:34:24 07/25/04 (1)

Perhaps you ought to read the discussion - racerguy 12:55:12 07/25/04 (0)

Tired old 'issues' - Frank.. 12:01:00 07/23/04 (48)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Christine Tham 19:15:57 07/23/04 (23)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Frank.. 03:15:04 07/24/04 (22)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Christine Tham 15:49:59 07/24/04 (8)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Frank.. 00:34:42 07/26/04 (7)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Christine Tham 15:18:00 07/26/04 (6)

Regions.. - Frank.. 23:52:53 07/26/04 (1)

Re: Regions.. - racerguy 07:53:33 07/27/04 (0)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - John Kotches 19:34:36 07/26/04 (3)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Christine Tham 00:16:25 07/27/04 (2)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - John Kotches 20:17:03 07/27/04 (1)

Re: Tired old 'issues' - Christine Tham 23:58:47 07/27/04 (0)

Re: Additions to the list ;-) - John Kotches 05:57:25 07/24/04 (12)

John: What is this list, exactly? - Craig Wilson 22:11:58 07/24/04 (10)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - John Kotches 11:20:17 07/25/04 (0)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - racerguy 07:15:38 07/25/04 (8)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - Craig Wilson 10:28:16 07/25/04 (7)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - racerguy 11:06:35 07/25/04 (6)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - Bobo U2 20:15:34 07/25/04 (5)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - racerguy 07:49:34 07/26/04 (4)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - Bobo U2 21:47:33 07/26/04 (3)

Re: John: What is this list, exactly? - racerguy 07:51:26 07/27/04 (2)

Re: racerguy...my apologies - Bobo U2 19:48:33 07/27/04 (1)

Thank you - racerguy 08:34:54 07/28/04 (0)

Re: And another one - John Kotches 05:58:56 07/24/04 (0)

Tired old excuses, Frank (nt) - racerguy 12:28:44 07/23/04 (23)

No, just you blowing issue's out of proportion. (nt) - Frank.. 12:37:43 07/23/04 (22)

Yeah, sure. Me and a bunch of other people who've looked at DVD-A and found it lacking in useability - racerguy 13:17:19 07/23/04 (21)

I take your point, but . . . - Martin419 15:33:06 07/23/04 (20)

I agree the situation is better than it used to be - racerguy 18:05:48 07/23/04 (19)

Re: I agree the situation is better than it used to be - timm 09:26:15 07/24/04 (18)

Re: I agree the situation is better than it used to be - agentalbert 11:06:00 07/24/04 (0)

Re: I agree the situation is better than it used to be - racerguy 10:05:11 07/24/04 (16)

Re: I agree the situation is better than it used to be - timm 15:16:44 07/24/04 (15)

Jumping through hoops - racerguy 18:07:21 07/24/04 (14)

Plus ... - Christine Tham 01:26:39 07/25/04 (12)

Re: Plus ... - racerguy 07:56:36 07/26/04 (11)

Hold on . . . - Martin419 09:00:49 07/27/04 (4)

Re: Hold on . . . - racerguy 11:30:04 07/27/04 (3)

Re: Hold on . . . - John Kotches 04:54:32 07/29/04 (2)

Re: Hold on . . . - racerguy 08:37:52 07/29/04 (0)

Re: Hold on . . . - Martin419 05:25:14 07/29/04 (0)

Re: Plus ... - Christine Tham 02:05:57 07/27/04 (1)

You forgot one thing - racerguy 07:59:45 07/27/04 (0)

You are grossly over exaggerating again. - Frank.. 00:09:33 07/27/04 (3)

You are attempting to minimize to the point of absurdity - racerguy 07:58:17 07/27/04 (1)

I would. - Frank.. 02:24:06 07/28/04 (0)

Re: You are grossly over exaggerating again. - Martin419 03:53:24 07/27/04 (0)

Re: Jumping through hoops - timm 22:09:43 07/24/04 (0)

It isn't really that simple... - Jim Pearce 10:47:29 07/23/04 (1)

Re: It isn't really that simple... - racerguy 11:09:28 07/23/04 (0)

Re: Flawed? Not nonsense. Definitely flawed. - agentalbert 10:05:23 07/23/04 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: I am not sure 192 is needed. From what I read, - evector 13:32:05 07/25/04 (0)