In Reply to: Re: You'll lose some bass but maybe not a big deal for you. posted by Neil Wilkes on July 19, 2004 at 09:54:54:
I know that it's not required to have information in the .1 channel, and I know that some people are even using it as a "height" channel, weirdly enough. But when there's a disk with full multichannel sound, you usually see it proudly promoted as a "5.1 mix". It sounds like you would prefer a "5.0 mix". (There are also quite a few 4.0 mixes, which I'm not happy about either.) I agree that it's messy and ridiculous that there isn't a standard that's adhered to. But because most audiophiles - though not all - have subwoofers, it makes a lot of sense to make the .1 channel a subwoofer channel. For people whose speakers other than the subwoofer don't handle the lowest bass, a 5.0 mix would cost them some bass, unless they have true bass management, which is far from universal. (And a 5.1 disk with a subwoofer .1 channel would cost a system without a subwoofer some bass in the absence of true bass management.) So I think using the .1 channel as a subwoofer channel is becoming a de facto standard.Craig
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You'll lose some bass but maybe not a big deal for you. - Craig Wilson 15:00:50 07/19/04 (0)