In Reply to: That's completely wrong... posted by Doug Schneider on July 21, 2024 at 12:58:13:
I said "As far as I know," because I am familiar with only three such programs. "Auto-BSC" was not on any of the lists of features. I was talking about "Auto-BSC" and perhaps I was not emphatic enough on that. (I have no experience with the very expensive modules from Loudsoft.com. I am told that Harbeth uses those.)
I had a phone conversation with the designer of the program I believe to be the most respected package (X-over Pro version 3) and he said that it was not part of his software and that he did not envision it as a possible feature of any "Insert the data, press 'Process' and you get a crossover design" packages, because there are too many cabinet-related variables.
Regardless, my point was that Baffle Step Compensation, as important as JA and I (and apparently you) think it is, is not something that every loudspeaker designer thinks is worth the trouble.
I was surprised as all get-out when JA commented upon the apparent lack of BSC on a very expensive solid-rock-enclosure loudspeaker he was measuring. I thought that with all that money on the table, why no BSC?
"Though the response in the crossover region is flat, there is a broad peak in the upper midrange, which implies a lack of baffle-step compensation in the crossover. The tweeter's output between 5kHz and 20kHz is 3-5dB higher than it is in the presence region, almost matching the level of the midrange peak."
john
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- That was NOT the fundamental premise!!! - John Marks 15:27:05 07/21/24 (3)
- Not sure where you got this idea... - Doug Schneider 17:12:13 07/21/24 (2)
- Whoa - John Marks 18:15:47 07/21/24 (1)
- Nope, Didn't... - Doug Schneider 18:43:04 07/21/24 (0)