In Reply to: Oppo Review posted by roxymott on April 21, 2007 at 18:47:03:
>Why would a review not devote a paragraph or two to the strengths
>of the unit = its video performance.
Because Stereophile collectively doesn't give a damn about
television!
>I believe it was also an older model.
It is still a current model, according to Oppo. Perhaps you know
better than they do?
And I am puzzled by the fact that there doesn't appear to be a peep
of acknowledgment from those who continually bitch about the cost of
products chosen for review in my magazine that our May issue majored
on affordable gear.
John Atkinson
Editor. Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Oppo Review - John Atkinson 07:45:12 04/22/07 (11)
- Re: Oppo Review - barondla 19:41:43 06/04/07 (0)
- Re: Oppo Review - bondmanp 07:00:40 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: Oppo Review - Frank I 14:32:03 04/24/07 (0)
- Affordable Gear - Yeah, what's with that? - Bob Rex 11:57:24 04/23/07 (1)
- I think it's hilarious when I read a review in Stereophile - nightdoggy 19:09:07 04/23/07 (0)
- Re: ..."my magazine..." - cdb 18:03:09 04/22/07 (2)
- Re: ..."my magazine..." - John Atkinson 03:35:51 04/25/07 (0)
- Why be so insulting? - Charles Hansen 18:49:22 04/22/07 (1)
- Re: Oppo Review - roxymott 14:10:06 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: Oppo Review - zako 12:17:12 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: Oppo Review - TomLarson 09:26:34 04/22/07 (0)