Am I correct in assuming that your transition to labeling PF reviewers' "loaners" in boldface is a work in progress and not yet completed? I'm leveling no accusations of any kind, and I'm open to being educated. But there are some things in your "Meet the writers" lists that seem very strange to me. How can some PF reviewers not own an amp, or a preamp, or a digital source? One reviewer - Robert Levi - has every single item in his list of equipment listed in boldface, while many others have nothing in boldface.Dave & Carol Clark's only amp is a loaner?
Dr. S does not own a preamp, amp, phono stage, cartridge, or cdp?
Marshall Nack doesn't own an amp?
John Brazier doesn't own a preamp?
John Acton owns no cdp, cables, accessories?
Ed Kobesky's only means of amplification is a loaned integrated amp?
Can this be right?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - David Robinson -- Can this be right? - Rick W 09:28:44 04/15/07 (11)
- No it is... though perhaps it is... - David Clark 12:04:16 04/15/07 (3)
- David, thanx for the clarification, but..... - Rick W 12:34:14 04/15/07 (2)
- you might try... - David Clark 12:51:16 04/15/07 (1)
- Well I'll be damned! - Rick W 13:08:43 04/15/07 (0)
- Re: David Robinson -- Can this be right? - JohnActon 09:48:19 04/15/07 (5)
- John, you should take another look. - Rick W 10:00:43 04/15/07 (4)
- Re: John, you should take another look. - JohnActon 10:10:57 04/15/07 (3)
- Well, that would certainly be weird. - Rick W 10:21:13 04/15/07 (2)
- Re: Well, that would certainly be weird. - JohnActon 10:41:54 04/15/07 (1)
- Damned if I understand it. Every single item in Levi's systems shows up boldface for me. nt - Rick W 10:58:29 04/15/07 (0)