In Reply to: Re: Cumbersome? posted by John Atkinson on March 7, 2007 at 10:00:44:
I addressed my question to you because *you* posted above, and *you* claimed my suggestion would be too "cumbersome". I would have thought it was blatantly obvious that I'd like the same suggestion implimented at all other hifi mags/e-zines too.Yes, the *current* lists from columnists Dudley & Marks were informative. But of course their lists could change 3/6/9 months from now with additional or different "loaners" and/or purchases. Big deal, your reviewers would actually have to spend ten minutes letting you know what's a loaner and what they bought, and you'd either have to add two words or use David's even simpler idea of bold type. It would be a very easy way to be more open and helpful. Obviously I asked for too much.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- John, GMAB with your "S'phile is being singled out" implication. - Rick W 15:59:33 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: John, GMAB with your "S'phile is being singled out" implication. - John Atkinson 06:32:28 03/08/07 (1)