Maybe you were out of phase when you read it. - Bruce Kendall

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - stereophile finished - PhillyB 10:54:55 01/22/07 (53)

Huh? - jokekajr 11:10:28 01/26/07 (0)

Stereophile magazine certainly is finished - DBerry 10:18:16 01/25/07 (0)

Yet another; "Stereophile doesn't do as I say it should" post.... - Sordidman 08:48:01 01/24/07 (0)

Let's hope not - mt10425 07:29:14 01/24/07 (0)

Re: stereophile finished - Rufipennis 22:27:55 01/23/07 (0)

Stereophile will not be finished until - suits_me 22:17:00 01/23/07 (0)

Are You kidding???? - vettracer 18:39:10 01/23/07 (5)

not long ago - hifitommy 19:49:55 01/23/07 (4)

Speaking of IAR... - mkuller 13:19:41 01/24/07 (3)

i remember him GUSHING - hifitommy 05:54:58 01/25/07 (2)

AIt was the "all other CD players are boat anchors" that got me...(nt) - mkuller 10:49:52 01/25/07 (1)

Re: AIt was the "all other CD players are boat anchors" that got me...(nt) - Robert Deutsch 12:38:26 01/25/07 (0)

I don't like the new direction either, but - Frihed89 07:16:45 01/23/07 (0)

I guess I just don't understand the need to... - chris keating 07:14:27 01/23/07 (0)

stereophile NOT finished - hifitommy 05:57:49 01/23/07 (0)

I find that Stereophile and TAS provide different but interesting perpsectives - starchild 03:31:08 01/23/07 (4)

what i am saying is - hifitommy 19:04:09 01/23/07 (1)

OK. I can roll with that - starchild 20:07:53 01/23/07 (0)

"Sound of the reviews in TAS leave my wanting more information." - hifitommy 06:00:22 01/23/07 (1)

Please clarify what you meant - starchild 09:17:53 01/23/07 (0)

Re: stereophile finished - hahax@verizon.net 20:24:21 01/22/07 (0)

Stereophile back in the mailbox - Papitwinki 19:15:03 01/22/07 (0)

Maybe you were out of phase when you read it. - Bruce Kendall 19:02:51 01/22/07 (1)

Many are! nt - clarkjohnsen 15:24:09 01/23/07 (0)

At least two people found something worthwhile - John Marks 16:28:42 01/22/07 (7)

All Hail Discordia! - Sommovigo 21:56:04 01/23/07 (0)

Oh, John . . . - Pjay 10:25:04 01/23/07 (0)

And I've already received several e-mails about my *letter*, even. - clarkjohnsen 17:22:30 01/22/07 (4)

What were the "two defined terms" in your conclusion? - soulfood 09:51:04 01/23/07 (3)

' It seems you're referring to a hypothetically consistent polarity to loudspeakers." NOT HYPOTHETICAL! - clarkjohnsen 14:30:57 01/23/07 (2)

Consistent polarity is arguably practical reality. - soulfood 16:23:24 01/23/07 (1)

I was saying, simply, that a solution *is* possible, however unlikely. nt - clarkjohnsen 19:35:01 01/23/07 (0)

TAS... - mkuller 11:25:56 01/22/07 (20)

Re: TAS... - PhillyB 13:21:25 01/22/07 (19)

Re: TAS... - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 18:16:31 01/22/07 (12)

You probably haven't been reading TAS that long..... - Bob Rex 05:56:38 01/23/07 (11)

I've been casually reading it for 10 years........... - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 12:20:29 01/23/07 (2)

Re: I've been casually reading it for 10 years........... - Bob Rex 12:43:01 01/23/07 (1)

Well stated - you know his opinion well! - E-Stat 13:19:58 01/23/07 (0)

Re:The lattitude in that definition is huge.. - theaudiohobby 06:05:12 01/23/07 (7)

Re:The lattitude in that definition is huge.. - Bob Rex 06:20:44 01/23/07 (6)

Re:The lattitude in that definition is huge.. - theaudiohobby 10:56:25 01/23/07 (3)

Re:The lattitude in that definition is huge.. - morricab 15:16:29 01/23/07 (2)

Re:The lattitude in that definition is huge.. - theaudiohobby 07:35:57 01/24/07 (1)

Re:The lattitude in that definition is huge.. - morricab 03:03:46 01/25/07 (0)

Agreed - E-Stat 09:33:21 01/23/07 (0)

You can add Ray Kimber to your list - John Marks 07:30:08 01/23/07 (0)

Where to begin? "Mark Fremmer reviewed a CD player and it was out of phase due to a wiring error, he thought it... - clarkjohnsen 17:32:31 01/22/07 (0)

Re: TAS... - Wendell Narrod 16:13:06 01/22/07 (2)

Re: TAS... - John Atkinson 15:07:33 01/23/07 (0)

Re: TAS... - the roofman 11:33:14 01/23/07 (0)

"I know many people in the mid-90s ..." - Dave Pogue 14:32:51 01/22/07 (0)

Golden Age... - mkuller 13:49:32 01/22/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Maybe you were out of phase when you read it. - Bruce Kendall 19:02:51 01/22/07 (1)

Many are! nt - clarkjohnsen 15:24:09 01/23/07 (0)