In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on November 17, 2024 at 23:27:17:
I wouldn't run the ribbon without a capacitor. It isn't just a matter of DC. It's all too easy to make a mistake, and then your ribbons are fried. As Roger says, you can compensate for the cap electronically if you wish. But I agree with him that since you want a cap, you might as well leave the existing crossover in place. It's easier, cheaper, and more practical.
I do run my system three-way, but that's because I've replaced the mids with Neo 8s, which are much more efficient than the ribbon and bass panels. I had them padded down for a while, but it was fairly ridiculous.
By the way, I second Roger's concern about the adhesive on the mids. Mine kept coming loose, and I had to press them back down. Don't know how he solved that problem. I agree too with his suggestion to replace them with foil if you can.
Finally, I don't think tubes are the best way to drive Maggies. They're just too power hungry. Maggies require several hundred watts to "sing." (Of course, it depends on how loud you like to listen -- I like to turn them up occasionally and listen at realistic levels, but most of us don't do that most of the time.) I had a Parasound A-21 on my bass panels for quite a while, and now I have a capable Class D amp and the Parasound is driving the tweeters -- overkill, I know, but I already have the Parasound, along with an AHB-2 on the mids -- not a large amp, but it's fine for the highly efficient Neo line.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 12:54:33 12/02/24 (17)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 01:23:09 12/03/24 (16)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 13:11:50 12/03/24 (0)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 02:51:07 12/03/24 (14)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 13:14:51 12/03/24 (6)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 00:08:48 12/04/24 (5)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 11:06:00 12/04/24 (0)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 04:15:52 12/04/24 (3)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 04:59:38 12/04/24 (2)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 06:42:44 12/04/24 (0)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - goryu 05:14:00 12/04/24 (0)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 03:16:30 12/03/24 (6)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 03:55:58 12/03/24 (5)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 04:17:36 12/03/24 (4)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 08:07:00 12/03/24 (3)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 09:52:09 12/03/24 (2)
- RE: Roger's comment ... - andyr 13:25:30 12/05/24 (0)
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 10:06:17 12/03/24 (0)