![]() |
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: Re: Type 45 etc posted by glenz on March 27, 2006 at 16:51:59:
glenz, hi. I believe RCA published data that showed 1.6 W as max single tube Class A. Later additions may have bumped it up to 2 W - but who is going to quible about 0.4 Watts? Not me.The so-called "45" that RAM labs is selling may deviate from the RCA specifications enough that it falls outside the parameters of what a Type 45 is. It should be called a "45-A" or something to make it clear it is Not a 45 but rather something akin to a 45 with higher dissipation. This cavalier attitude with specifications is just plain annoying.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Type 45 etc - elektron 09:38:25 03/28/06 (9)
- Re: Type 45 etc - glenz 18:51:39 03/28/06 (0)
- Re: Type 45 etc - glenz 18:46:39 03/28/06 (7)
- Re: Type 45 etc - elektron 13:49:17 03/29/06 (5)
- Re: Type 45 etc - glenz 14:36:15 03/29/06 (0)
- Re: Type 45 etc - glenz 14:23:33 03/29/06 (3)
- uniform standards of manufacture - elektron 16:25:19 03/29/06 (2)
- Re: uniform standards of manufacture - glenz 17:11:11 03/29/06 (0)
- Re: uniform standards of manufacture - glenz 16:52:08 03/29/06 (0)
- Re: Type 45 etc - cleantimestream 06:07:47 03/29/06 (0)