In Reply to: Re: I'm not sure the K&H you chose to display is posted by KlausR. on May 8, 2007 at 04:40:36:
"Both are better than the Sonus Faber in terms of accuracy, neutrality, price/performance-ratio and perhaps more"You have confirmed this in direct, head to head, listening sessions? If not then I don't think you can make this claim except perhaps on paper. You will grant that not much can be made from this one curve, won't you? I mean it is not clear if it is on-axis only and at what distance (important for a 1st order xover). The in-room response could very well be very flat. You also have no idea what the distortion levels are for this speaker nor do you know the levels at which the onset of thermal compression occurs or dynamic compression. Finally, you have no idea whether the driver and cabinet colorations are better or worse than your K+H speakers.
If you have done direct comparisons between K+H and this speaker then I will listen to what you have to say, otherwise you are speculating with precious little information about the SF speaker.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I'm not sure the K&H you chose to display is - morricab 08:11:48 05/08/07 (7)
- Let's see - KlausR. 09:05:31 05/08/07 (6)
- Re: Let's see - morricab 15:02:27 05/08/07 (5)
- Re: Let's see - KlausR. 00:36:30 05/09/07 (4)
- Re: Let's see - morricab 02:27:08 05/09/07 (3)
- Re: Let's see - Pinkus 07:33:44 05/09/07 (2)
- What is state of the art? - KlausR. 09:20:43 05/09/07 (0)
- Re: Let's see - morricab 09:10:04 05/09/07 (1)