In Reply to: Bruce has banned me three time, twice admitting his mistake and posted by Duilawyer on July 15, 2006 at 08:18:57:
vigorously ooposing the Iraq war in the crazed period following 9\11. I was called every name in the book, threatened, etc., then banned. Never for profanity, obscenity, lying, or breaking any rule.
JUST for the content of my views, which 67% of America now realizes were right.
BFD.
Back then it was me and Robert Byrd, pretty much.FWIW: I have been banned as well from the Hi-rez for correctly pointing out and even predicting the (then) imminent demise of SACD and DVD Audio, and questioning its audible superiority. Never for conduct, just for views that went against the powers that be.
And were proven correct!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- it is a not small point of pride that my first banning was for - Duilawyer 09:13:44 07/15/06 (3)
- For what it's worth, I'm with you (or your type) all the way... - Guy, 20:35:55 07/15/06 (2)
- It was my views Bruce wanted gone; - Duilawyer 21:21:13 07/15/06 (1)
- Re: Fine. Thanks. * - Guy, 21:55:25 07/15/06 (0)