In Reply to: Re: Likes and dislikes are VERY subjective BUT ....... posted by Karma16 on April 25, 2007 at 06:22:20:
"But prior to recorded music, one might see or hear a piece once, only once in a lifetime. So how would one study a piece over and over again to understand its wonder?"Those who wanted to, or needed to, used one or two piano reductions.
"So, from my point of view, if a piece does not impact me the first time I must wonder if it is really worth anything to me. I do grant that modern ears must acclimate to stylistic differences caused by time. Because of this I am willing to be a little patient with myself and the music. But eventually, I either like it or leave it behind. As was said below, life really is too short."
You're right, but I can't tell you how many times I revisited a piece--at my own pace and perogative--and suddenly it made sense. Why? I don't know. I believe many or most at the premiere of Tchaikovsky's Swan Lake or Sleeping Beauty didn't like it at all, and it seems pretty easy to "get" and enjoy to me. I hope that they gave it a try again someday. After years of revisiting, I've "left behind" Messian, Ives, and most Haydn. Oh, and how 'bout the reverse-- music that I liked the first time but don't like (I get bored with) now? Sadly, very sadly, Shostakovich is falling into that category.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Likes and dislikes are VERY subjective BUT ....... - jdaniel 09:05:13 04/25/07 (0)