In Reply to: Yes, see below! It's actually quite telling about critics, real paid ones! * posted by Timbo in Oz on March 1, 2007 at 16:30:47:
...but also to have retained the nuances of all performances in their heads.Some dunderheads have suggested that the hapless critic who preferred Hatto to Haebler (the *great* Haebler IMO) was the most egregious example of all, without realizing that two Haebler sets exist, only the lesser of which was available to that critic, the other being issued only in Japan and therefore presumably not up for review in a UK publication, although it appears (we do not know for sure) the latter was the one B-C employed.
I guess it's just a game of Get the Critic.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Nothing of the sort, unless one (irrationally) expects critics not only to have heard all recordings... - clarkjohnsen 11:01:06 03/02/07 (2)
- exactly critics statements about recordings ARE therefore, unreliable - Timbo in Oz 11:44:06 03/02/07 (1)
- Whether re audio equipment or music, ...... - feet's too big 07:11:40 03/05/07 (0)