In Reply to: Hard to fault posted by markrohr on February 26, 2007 at 12:17:18:
...why did the critics find the music so wonderful when they believed it was performed by Hatto and so (apparently) forgettable from the actual performers???
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- But... - kerr 13:22:04 02/26/07 (10)
- Where do you find them saying the originals were "forgettable"? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:53:25 02/27/07 (3)
- Indirectly by the fact that the scam lasted as long as it did (nt) - kerr 11:47:19 02/27/07 (2)
- Absolutely right. If the recordings supposedly done by Hatto... - SE 03:32:49 02/28/07 (1)
- Yes, that was my point exactly! - kerr 09:22:08 03/01/07 (0)
- I think it was the high productivity and apparent versatility that impressed - Bambi B 10:52:38 02/27/07 (2)
- Re: I think it was the high productivity and apparent versatility that impressed - kerr 11:57:09 02/27/07 (1)
- "source of embarrassment to the music reviewers..." {shhhhhhhhhh....}...N/T - musetap 15:20:17 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: But... - geoff_j 18:35:26 02/26/07 (1)
- Re: But... - kerr 12:02:38 02/27/07 (0)
- An excellent question, though the answer is probably mundane. nt - markrohr 16:37:36 02/26/07 (0)