In Reply to: Vänskä and Beethoven posted by il Barbiere on February 19, 2007 at 03:41:16:
Vanska is fast, dynamic, heavily accented with large contrasts in volume (the pianos verge on the inaudible) but very few modifications of tempo, other than at the usual places (ends of sections, movements). This is bound to be the complete antithesis to any fan of Furtwangler, for example.I miss the flexibility and expression of, say, Bruno Walter in this material. If that could be combined with Vanska's drive, then you would have the ideal Beethoven interpretation, IMO.
It all adds up to a superficially exciting but rather faceless way of playing Bethoven. New insights? Perhaps the best that can be said about the three SACDs released so far is that they present a major American orchestra in the best possible light. In terms of precision, balance and beauty of sound they trump my previous (American) favorites of Cleveland, New York and Philadelphia playing Beethoven.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Vänskä and Beethoven - C.B. 07:21:44 02/19/07 (6)
- went back to Szell's on rbcd in the car today (Eroica)... - docw 21:00:02 03/06/07 (0)
- they trump them? - docw 07:18:45 02/20/07 (4)
- Yeah, hard to believe... - C.B. 10:24:54 02/20/07 (3)
- Thanks for your explanation - docw 13:39:20 02/20/07 (2)
- Well, I didn't say that Szell and the Cleveland weren't precise... - C.B. 04:21:52 02/21/07 (1)
- yes, I agree, but with your ability and knowledge, thought... - docw 10:19:02 02/21/07 (0)