In Reply to: Listened last night on the radio to the original (mono) Victory at Sea -- my own recording! posted by clarkjohnsen on October 12, 2006 at 09:35:57:
After the first two movements, I thought this one had a lot of promise.... (The Largo approched Szell's definitive reading.) The Third Movement was good, but struck me as "Maazelian"- Too much rhythmic detail.... It drowned out the melodic interplay. Somewhat "muscular", if you will. The final movement, aside from the secondary melody and final fanfare, was merely OK.... My biggest complaint is the 4th-Movement opening melody played with the notes cut short. A common failing in this work, in my humble opinion.It's a nice historical perspective. For an old mono master transferred to CD, the sonics were disgustingly good.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I Listened to the Talich Dvorak 9..... - Todd Krieger 15:48:07 10/14/06 (6)
- "the sonics were disgustingly good." Why shouldn't they be? - clarkjohnsen 08:32:42 10/16/06 (5)
- yes, mono can be pretty amazing, especially chamber music - jdaniel 08:47:13 10/16/06 (4)
- Some here will tell you you're full of it for liking that old stuff. - clarkjohnsen 09:02:21 10/16/06 (3)
- Re: Some here will tell you you're full of it for liking that old stuff. - jdaniel 12:23:27 10/16/06 (2)
- There are earlier Budapests than the '52 -- and I thought you meant the studio recordings. - clarkjohnsen 13:44:39 10/16/06 (1)
- Re: There are earlier Budapests than the '52 -- and I thought you meant the studio recordings. - Brian Cheney 15:39:24 10/16/06 (0)