Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So,

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - tinear 07:46:14 05/15/07 (134)

Somebody forgot to tell the folks at SA-CD.net, there are now 4,536 SA-CDs. - Teresa 01:29:49 05/20/07 (1)

After seven years of existence - 4536 SACD titles! Whoa! - porky_pig_jr 15:03:21 05/22/07 (0)

Nice troll, tin. You da' man! - Bruce from DC 15:30:48 05/18/07 (0)

Double blind tests... - KlausR. 00:16:52 05/17/07 (7)

Re: "...does the public in general recognize the advantages and benefits of new formats. Apparently it doesn't." - tlyyra 05:45:08 05/17/07 (6)

Re: "...does the public in general recognize the advantages and benefits of new formats. Apparently it doesn't." - KlausR. 08:06:23 05/17/07 (5)

Re: "...does the public in general recognize the advantages and benefits of new formats. Apparently it doesn't." - tlyyra 09:18:14 05/17/07 (4)

Re: hi-rez is increased definition and dynamics - KlausR. 04:36:22 05/18/07 (3)

Re: hi-rez is increased definition and dynamics - tlyyra 05:54:57 05/18/07 (2)

Re: better solutions in our audio systems - KlausR. 06:19:11 05/18/07 (1)

Re: better solutions in our audio systems - tlyyra 07:55:53 05/18/07 (0)

SACD: mixed bag, IME - cdb 20:16:11 05/15/07 (1)

The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated - Joe M 19:47:14 05/15/07 (0)

SACD bombed very, very badly - one suggestion why - John C. - Aussie 17:48:36 05/15/07 (1)

Just to see how badly it bombed, - sser2 17:01:37 05/15/07 (3)

2 Channel Is Better Than 5? - Robertc88 06:38:52 05/16/07 (2)

I was joking. - sser2 09:30:59 05/16/07 (1)

Lots Are Giving Up Though - Robertc88 12:02:26 05/16/07 (0)

Agreed, but redbook digital is usually poorly processed - but try out the new Benchmark DAC 1 mod from Empirical Audio - John C. - Aussie 15:08:23 05/15/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Dan Banquer 12:50:42 05/15/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Todd Krieger 12:50:19 05/15/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Dr. S. 12:46:29 05/15/07 (29)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:27:43 05/15/07 (28)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Dr. S 20:33:22 05/15/07 (27)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:57:43 05/16/07 (25)

Ok, so I will try this without being snotty - Dr. S 20:49:50 05/16/07 (24)

Re: Ok, so I will try this without being snotty - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:02:25 05/17/07 (19)

Chris "High-rez PCM is superior to DSD"? Not in my system! - Teresa 23:55:26 05/19/07 (3)

RE: Chris "High-rez PCM is superior to DSD"? Not in my system! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:33:55 05/20/07 (2)

Here you go Chris in your own words in this very thread: - Teresa 17:23:35 05/20/07 (1)

RE: Here you go Chris in your own words in this very thread: - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:10:37 05/21/07 (0)

Re: Ok, so I will try this without being snotty - Dr. S 15:37:55 05/18/07 (10)

Re: Ok, so I will try this without being snotty - Christopher Redmond 00:32:14 05/19/07 (9)

F.Y.I: There is NO audible noise with PURE DSD even though headphones. 192kHz PCM has more audible noise for example. - Teresa 00:00:44 05/20/07 (5)

RE: F.Y.I: There is NO audible noise with PURE DSD even though headphones. 192kHz PCM has more audible noise for exampl - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:40:47 05/20/07 (4)

All I am saying is just listen for yourself on your Stax Lambda - Teresa 16:56:58 05/20/07 (3)

RE: All I am saying is just listen for yourself on your Stax Lambda - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:57:28 05/21/07 (2)

RE: All I am saying is just listen for yourself on your Stax Lambda - Teresa 22:31:13 05/21/07 (1)

RE: All I am saying is just listen for yourself on your Stax Lambda - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:40:58 05/22/07 (0)

Re: Ok, so I will try this without being snotty - Dr. S 21:34:17 05/19/07 (2)

Re: Ok, so I will try this without being snotty - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 06:39:51 05/20/07 (1)

Re: Corporate Greed - Dr. S 13:50:43 05/20/07 (0)

Re: What you believe ... - Dr. S 06:57:43 05/18/07 (3)

Re: What you believe ... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:00:30 05/18/07 (2)

Re: What you believe ... - Dr. S 14:53:01 05/20/07 (1)

Yes - horse flogged but it's been fun :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:40:59 05/20/07 (0)

Yes, but here's the irony - Dave Pogue 05:14:14 05/17/07 (3)

Re: Ah yes, the irony - Dr. S 07:09:34 05/17/07 (2)

Re: Ah yes, the irony - Dave Pogue 08:49:12 05/17/07 (1)

Re: Losses - Dr. S 11:11:02 05/17/07 (0)

Well said!! (nt) - JCS 01:57:01 05/16/07 (0)

LONG LIVE THE CD!!! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:04:54 05/15/07 (21)

"CD is and always has been capable of the very finest audio replay available" ?????????????????? - Teresa 00:20:06 05/20/07 (0)

"A different taste which excited the pallet." My poor pallet only gets excited... - clarkjohnsen 10:14:03 05/16/07 (5)

Try reversing... - Ozzie 19:36:17 06/15/16 (0)

Re: "A different taste which excited the pallet." My poor pallet only gets excited... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:33:56 05/16/07 (3)

Pallet... palette... Get it? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:08:05 05/16/07 (2)

Palate, perhaps? (nt) - Dave Pogue 05:20:01 05/17/07 (0)

Goddit! :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:24:32 05/16/07 (0)

Re: LONG LIVE THE CD!!! - truthseekerprime 08:24:54 05/16/07 (7)

"The memory player is pure, 100% snake oil marketed to suckers." Pity. - clarkjohnsen 09:57:25 05/16/07 (6)

read their white paper then - truthseekerprime 11:43:06 05/16/07 (5)

Re: read their white paper then - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:42:18 05/16/07 (0)

"This... is total nonsense." It's all back to you, and what you think, again. Some "seeker"! nt - clarkjohnsen 12:09:34 05/16/07 (3)

huh? - truthseekerprime 12:20:12 05/16/07 (2)

"...but I don't think you are." Always what *you* think. And wrong every time! nt - clarkjohnsen 12:30:44 05/16/07 (1)

Umm... yeah, obviously my posts are about what *I* think. - truthseekerprime 12:42:34 05/16/07 (0)

Re: LONG LIVE THE CD!!! - audioengr 15:24:42 05/15/07 (0)

Quite an obtuse statement... - Mr_bill2 12:59:59 05/15/07 (4)

Re: Quite an obtuse statement... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:08:43 05/15/07 (3)

Actually, I didn't think you would care... - Mr_bill2 15:06:56 05/15/07 (2)

Re: Actually, I didn't think you would care... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:17:29 05/15/07 (1)

Oh..T&C, now I understand. - Mr_bill2 16:48:51 05/15/07 (0)

So did you by not posting in the proper forum...ZZZZZZZZZZ....nt - The Bastard With The Hammer 11:07:28 05/15/07 (3)

nothing wrong with posting the sacd subject here - hifitommy 18:48:40 05/15/07 (2)

Don't you find it ironic - Sordidman 11:16:50 05/16/07 (0)

Agreed - Robertc88 06:23:03 05/16/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - illini_skn 10:15:09 05/15/07 (1)

I pray for redbook-quality downloads, hopefully well-recorded - Jon L 09:42:28 05/15/07 (1)

Why aim so low? Why not 24 Bit 96kHz downloads? They are coming by the way. - Teresa 00:32:01 05/20/07 (0)

Multichannel - Robertc88 09:34:05 05/15/07 (2)

Re: Multichannel - rico 10:01:57 05/15/07 (0)

Re: Multichannel ---yeah! - mikel 09:38:53 05/15/07 (0)

CD bombed very, very badly. So, - Norm 09:10:11 05/15/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Don T 09:09:06 05/15/07 (1)

Yep - Sordidman 10:13:25 05/15/07 (0)

I dunno, man... - Presto 09:02:13 05/15/07 (35)

Re: I dunno, man... - audioengr 15:39:47 05/15/07 (3)

Which Metheny album sounds so awful? - Dave Pogue 05:23:55 05/17/07 (2)

Re: Which Metheny album sounds so awful? - I thought the DVD Audio of Imaginary Day sounded terrible. (nt) - Teresa 01:35:55 05/20/07 (1)

Imaginary Day is an atypical Metheny album, IMHO - Dave Pogue 05:19:58 05/20/07 (0)

Woohoo! - markrohr 09:28:40 05/15/07 (30)

I never said that. - Presto 23:20:38 05/15/07 (17)

You hit the nail on the head! Would you drink the beer you LOVE if it was WARM? - Teresa 00:53:35 05/20/07 (0)

this seems completely artificial to me... - tunenut 22:51:26 05/16/07 (3)

maybe you don't like the artists on Reference Recordings? Or the music? - Teresa 00:45:06 05/20/07 (0)

Artificial? I think not. - Presto 10:56:19 05/17/07 (1)

that's very idealistic - tunenut 11:19:00 05/17/07 (0)

"This is not MUSICasylum. It's AUDIOasylum." ---Sez it all. - markrohr 10:18:28 05/16/07 (11)

Well, you did say... - Presto 11:29:59 05/16/07 (10)

Please, for goodness' sake, stop with the analogies already. - markrohr 13:46:59 05/16/07 (9)

Well I don't drink beer anymore but... - Presto 17:11:45 05/16/07 (8)

"I really don't think asking for both is as limiting..." I agree with you 100% also - Teresa 01:04:57 05/20/07 (0)

So you won't listen to a great performance of a classical work, or a killer pop record, unless it sounds good. - markrohr 11:18:22 05/17/07 (6)

with all the 100's of recordings this old MONO "Das Lied" is the ONLY one that has ever moved you. - Teresa 01:09:36 05/20/07 (0)

That depends on how you feel about being called an audiophile I suppose!! :o) - Presto 16:55:14 05/17/07 (4)

If "improvements" to your system make iffy records sound worse . . . - markrohr 05:32:18 05/18/07 (3)

No, having more than one system is the ONLY direction - Presto 10:23:44 05/18/07 (2)

Re: No, having more than one system is the ONLY direction - markrohr 12:01:26 05/18/07 (1)

Re: No, having more than one system is the ONLY direction - Presto 13:38:28 05/18/07 (0)

give me great music on a shitty recording any day! - hifitommy 18:45:30 05/15/07 (8)

I prefer a third option: Great music on great recordings and I get it too! - Teresa 01:14:09 05/20/07 (2)

thats wonderful when it happens - hifitommy 08:43:18 05/20/07 (1)

Also great sounding are the multi-mic'ed Decca/London Phase 4 recordings conducted by Berrnard Herrmann. - Teresa 17:30:21 05/20/07 (0)

Re: give me great music on a shitty recording any day! - Dave Pogue 05:23:11 05/18/07 (1)

iec - hifitommy 11:44:31 05/20/07 (0)

Emailed you last week - need your address fine sir to send CDs. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:08:57 05/16/07 (1)

ooopsy - hifitommy 20:06:49 05/16/07 (0)

Absotutely! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:00:02 05/16/07 (0)

"Who has time to listen to great recordings of lousy performances?" - musetap 11:22:46 05/15/07 (2)

Quite correct, my great recordings of lousy performances go on eBay. (nt) - Teresa 01:17:04 05/20/07 (0)

Well said. (nt) - Presto 11:01:21 05/17/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - some young guy 08:33:49 05/15/07 (10)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Ozzy 08:37:39 05/15/07 (9)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - jharris 09:00:06 05/15/07 (8)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Ozzy 09:18:22 05/15/07 (7)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - jharris 15:20:11 05/15/07 (4)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Ozzy 01:54:30 05/16/07 (3)

I think you - jharris 03:57:44 05/16/07 (2)

Re: I think you - Ozzy 07:21:56 05/16/07 (1)

Re: I think you - jharris 09:22:06 05/16/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - some young guy 13:58:13 05/15/07 (0)

IMO, - Esoteric's transport and "better" redbook - Sordidman 10:09:23 05/15/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - jharris 09:00:06 05/15/07 (8)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Ozzy 09:18:22 05/15/07 (7)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - jharris 15:20:11 05/15/07 (4)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - Ozzy 01:54:30 05/16/07 (3)

I think you - jharris 03:57:44 05/16/07 (2)

Re: I think you - Ozzy 07:21:56 05/16/07 (1)

Re: I think you - jharris 09:22:06 05/16/07 (0)

Re: SACD bombed very, very badly. So, - some young guy 13:58:13 05/15/07 (0)

IMO, - Esoteric's transport and "better" redbook - Sordidman 10:09:23 05/15/07 (0)

157.234.254.6

Post a Message!