Home Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Does your question mean you have a NOS DAC and want to upgrade

or are you asking about how NOS compares to sigma-delta?

From a technical standpoint the difference is that NOS has no filtering whereas oversampling DACs include a filter. I've never heard a NOS DAC but many like them. They are certainly not more technically accurate than an oversampling type - there is no filter to remove the aliases and they have a small high frequency roll-off (that is usually compensated by a small boost in the oversampling filter design). NOS DACs have to be a 'flash-type' converter than converts the whole 16 bit, or 24 bit word in one go, whereas oversampling types usually work at lower amplitude resolution (less bits) but make it up by converting them more often and averaging (i.e. low pass filtering) to regain the full resolution.
Is there something inherently better about NOS - I can't see that unless it is related to better phase response because no filter (though the signal will still get low pass filtered somewhere further down the chain by amplifiers and speakers)? Or, it is because the aliases aren't removed and the flash-type DACs are less linear an add a bit more distortion and people like those additions?


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.