From where I am I can get the CD101 and the DP67 at roughly the same price. I have heard the CD101 in several occasions and enjoyed its balanced, open, detailed, resolute, articulate and slightly laid back presentation. However I found it a bit on the light side and perhaps lacking the "you are there" feel. And this prevents me from making it my choice, despite the obvious benefit that this will probably synergize with my Plinius 9200 amplification.I have heard an Accuphase CDP (can't recall which one) a long time ago and thought it was wonderful - liquid, smooth and robust. I have no way to audition the DP67. I have researched on post regards Accuphase CDPs and found this helpful, particularly AP's comments on the Plinius CD101 and DP57. I would appreciate comments on the DP67, more especially if there is anyone who has compared this with the Plinius. Thanks.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Plinius CD101 vs Accuphase DP67 (calling on AP) - dnnaudio 22:26:12 09/05/06 (12)
- Apologies for the late response... - Audio Pharaoh 07:16:32 09/08/06 (8)
- Re: Apologies for the late response... - dnnaudio 22:59:49 09/08/06 (7)
- Re: Apologies for the late response... - Audio Pharaoh 17:41:07 09/09/06 (6)
- Ok thanks, - dnnaudio 18:21:03 09/10/06 (1)
- Re: Ok thanks, - Audio Pharaoh 18:46:48 09/10/06 (0)
- I strongly agree with you, AP - Felix W 21:52:03 09/09/06 (3)
- Re: I strongly agree with you, AP - Audio Pharaoh 18:31:34 09/10/06 (0)
- Re: I strongly agree with you, AP - dnnaudio 18:26:03 09/10/06 (1)
- Re: I strongly agree with you, AP - George Mann 18:52:24 09/10/06 (0)
- Re: Plinius CD101 vs Accuphase DP67 (calling on AP) - George Mann 16:22:02 09/06/06 (2)
- Re: Plinius CD101 vs Accuphase DP67 (calling on AP) - dnnaudio 18:35:52 09/06/06 (1)
- Re: Plinius CD101 vs Accuphase DP67 (calling on AP) - George Mann 00:28:30 09/07/06 (0)