I just don't get how so many people in this hobby insist that 'redbook' is as good as SACD. It must be something akin to mass hypnosis, where a few influential people are successful in leading others to believe something which is clearly not true. Although I wouldn't regard myself as a 'golden ear', it is very plain that SACD is not just better than redbook CD, it simply wipes the floor with it. I mean the delta is not small. I remember the first time I put on an SACD in my system at home. I was floored at the incredible sound coming from my speakers. It was just night and day. Even my wife, a person who is completely uninterested in my audio hobby knows SACD sounds WAY better. I've heard expensive CD players too. The other day I listened to a 17k rig for redbook, and I've also heard the amazing DCS rig (the best I've heard for normal CD playback). But I get home and put a well-recorded SACD on my moderately priced but exceptionally good Denon 3910 and it is so much better than even the most expensive redbook rig. SACD is so much less compressed, especially in the midrange. The highs are much much more realistic and the bass is better resolved. The soundstage is much larger/deeper and imaging is far superior. The best SACD recordings even give vinyl a run for the money whereas CD just doesn't compare at all. CD just does not posess the resolution and inner detail of SACD.I wanted to ask fellow inmates - Do you think that manufacturers are trying to persuade us that CD is on par with SACD and if so why? I've pretty much decided that any digital player I buy at this point forward has to support the clearly superior SACD format.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - O'Shag 23:30:06 08/13/06 (74)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Bob Neill 05:50:04 08/17/06 (5)
- Could it be true? - Feanor 12:39:01 08/20/06 (1)
- Re: Could it be true? - Bob Neill 15:19:05 08/20/06 (0)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - O'Shag 02:16:11 08/18/06 (1)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Bob Neill 06:41:08 08/18/06 (0)
- Good advice - Larry I 12:13:12 08/17/06 (0)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - tantra 00:27:38 08/15/06 (9)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Todd Krieger 00:53:18 08/15/06 (8)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Bob Neill 05:44:18 08/17/06 (0)
- Unfortunately there are those in the Audio World convincing us we are 'at war with east asia' - O'Shag 14:44:41 08/15/06 (6)
- Re: Unfortunately there are those in the Audio World convincing us we are 'at war with east asia' - Todd Krieger 22:58:55 08/15/06 (5)
- Re: Unfortunately there are those in the Audio World convincing us we are 'at war with east asia' - O'Shag 10:52:50 08/16/06 (0)
- My Hi-Rez experience - The Sound Guy 03:42:47 08/16/06 (3)
- My understanding regarding ferrite cores ... - Feanor 13:15:43 08/20/06 (0)
- Re: My Hi-Rez experience - O'Shag 02:23:13 08/18/06 (1)
- Re: My Hi-Rez experience - The Sound Guy 20:28:29 08/18/06 (0)
- The Bliss of a Root Canal.... - Todd Krieger 20:39:14 08/14/06 (3)
- Sounds like simple, anti-digital bigotry ~nt - Feanor 12:29:14 08/20/06 (0)
- Re: The Bliss of a Root Canal.... - O'Shag 21:13:27 08/14/06 (1)
- What does this prove? - Feanor 12:26:52 08/20/06 (0)
- I am a fan of SACD but... - tunenut 15:50:32 08/14/06 (19)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - O'Shag 17:48:11 08/14/06 (18)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:43:07 08/18/06 (7)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - O'Shag 15:23:01 08/18/06 (6)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:45:35 08/19/06 (5)
- so are you disappointed with the APL mods? - tunenut 14:55:55 08/19/06 (3)
- Re: so are you disappointed with the APL mods? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:54:14 08/20/06 (2)
- A superbly sane and right on post, especially: - Bob Neill 05:31:13 08/19/06 (0)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - tunenut 18:10:21 08/14/06 (9)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - Larry I 08:51:29 08/16/06 (4)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - O'Shag 02:40:07 08/18/06 (1)
- Not side-bt-side, - Larry I 06:40:50 08/18/06 (0)
- I hope some folks on the fence read this, it is very suggestive. - Bob Neill 13:08:07 08/17/06 (0)
- rock music - tunenut 20:41:48 08/16/06 (0)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - O'Shag 20:44:08 08/14/06 (3)
- contrast your two statements - tunenut 09:31:42 08/15/06 (0)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - Frank25 05:52:13 08/15/06 (1)
- Re: I am a fan of SACD but... - O'Shag 14:51:34 08/15/06 (0)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Bertie_Livingston 15:20:35 08/14/06 (13)
- the constant chirping can be annoying but it works on certain material - tunenut 09:23:08 08/15/06 (1)
- Re: the constant chirping can be annoying but it works on certain material - Bertie_Livingston 15:33:35 08/15/06 (0)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Ted Smith 16:59:31 08/14/06 (4)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - O'Shag 17:53:51 08/14/06 (3)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Bertie_Livingston 01:02:15 08/15/06 (2)
- Is this what you were talking about? - Ted Smith 10:06:04 08/16/06 (0)
- You'll have to come over and point it out sometime :) - Ted Smith 07:12:53 08/15/06 (0)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - O'Shag 16:57:34 08/14/06 (5)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - Bertie_Livingston 01:05:11 08/15/06 (0)
- Technically wrong on dynamic range - vettracer 17:29:44 08/14/06 (3)
- Wrong - Ted Smith 18:34:47 08/14/06 (1)
- OK, I stand corrected - vettracer 20:48:51 08/14/06 (0)
- Re: Technically wrong on dynamic range - O'Shag 18:02:45 08/14/06 (0)
- SACD vs. RBCD - mcondo 13:46:52 08/14/06 (3)
- Re: SACD vs. RBCD - jimmycj 14:17:38 08/15/06 (2)
- Re: SACD vs. RBCD - mcondo 07:08:49 08/16/06 (1)
- Re: SACD vs. RBCD - jimmycj 19:59:07 08/16/06 (0)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - O'Shag 13:06:51 08/14/06 (0)
- Even if you are right, and you may well be.... - Chuck Y 12:18:18 08/14/06 (5)
- "For those of us who don't sit around fixated on the 'sound' of our systems . . . " - JoshT 12:38:57 08/14/06 (4)
- Re: "For those of us who don't sit around fixated on the 'sound' of our systems . . . " - O'Shag 14:21:56 08/14/06 (3)
- "Isn't that what the hobby is all about"...... - Chuck Y 16:17:15 08/14/06 (2)
- Re: "Isn't that what the hobby is all about"...... - O'Shag 21:23:49 08/14/06 (0)
- P.S. I goofed...... - Chuck Y 18:46:41 08/14/06 (0)
- What bothers me is . . . - JoshT 09:56:36 08/14/06 (3)
- Re: What bothers me is . . . - ts 10:12:25 08/14/06 (2)
- Re: What bothers me is . . . - quickie 10:34:58 08/14/06 (1)
- Re: What bothers me is . . . - O'Shag 01:53:51 08/18/06 (0)
- The Clear Danger of generalizing from insufficient data. - Al Sekela 09:17:35 08/14/06 (1)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - ehlarson 06:45:50 08/14/06 (3)
- Re: The Clear Superiority of SACD in the Digital Class - O'Shag 03:10:51 08/18/06 (0)
- Nope - Ted Smith 09:52:11 08/14/06 (1)
- ehlarson, trust the Tedster on this one. - Ozzie 10:41:34 08/14/06 (0)